In recent years much emphasis has been on project management methodologies like Prince2. Defining the introduction and use of these techniques for the structured expectations of the larger community, which will do the project, and how the communication is, for example, the project will not be surprised lieu.Par a project manager with a number of documents including comprisAffaire ¨ , Document · Launch project, product · ° Flow Chart Product Highlight rapportsConnectez See you · · Risque.Le standard development process is obviously useful for those latter, and used standard for documents to support many challenges for the project plan and worked around templates. In order to be credible methods necessary to the most complex situations (eg the construction of Olympic venues in London 2012 address), the size and the size of some of these methods can result in serious problems such as Project Lead the purpose of deciding which elements of the method may be considered optional and tried to reduce the extent of the approach for small projects. The level of detail or the number of stages of the plans is a question of judges, as well as the appropriate composition of the Supervisory Board in a Prince2 approach. Sometimes this reduction through external commercial time and time pressure with people asking why do not you stop the production of documents and get the team on the production do something, but focus triggered are also able to by the staff available to the supervisory role and structures envisagées . TeamThe ensure Le Leader and role of project manager and his team that records and controls are of good quality, can sometimes be decided enough attention to be given. œ It is difficult to know when a risk register is complete. This newspaper will sometimes put together with brainstorming or other techniques of cooperation, but the obvious need to have some non-reduced risk may result in the “game”. · At WBS Decide product and interdependencies can be really difficile.Comme project methods have become more frequent, the author observed a trend of expertise for project managers who are considered by some as less important. The project manager is more of a generalist who understands the process of project management, but as a person with experience specific challenges, which participates in the activities (software development, such as the construction of an airport). There is little substitute for experience, to assess a project, whether a small problem, one that will stay low, or perhaps a problem threatens the entire project (or program) should be made possible. This does not mean that the managers of software projects, must know how to program, for example, but if they do not understand, for example, the difference between the agent and representative testing environments for unit testing and system integration terribledouloureux.L team might seem a to play a decisive role, but the team is reluctant to tell their boss that he or she is wrong. Even if the message is delivered, it can be reduced to or confused with a lack of discipline. Independents can play a valuable role to play to these challenges is that the project face.Mis aside, the challenges, discover from the need to define performance management, it often big problems with the estimates and assumptions in specialized services, by The project will be delivered. These assumptions are critical to the whole project and often need a detailed technical review of the cases and bring them to light. be the technical staff within a project may not be aware of their interpretation of business requirements has included assumptions of hazardous and dangerous examples of some dangerous assumptions that the author discovered during the examination of recent projects: · Wait client IDs, systems regularly . synchronize • A poor understanding of the speed of response needed to help call center employees in the design of a complex integration of systems back to commentaires Plus office.Projet recently has much attention, “commented the bridge given. In the UK, the OGC Gateway review process have established that organizations can be published. He recognizes the value, however, that these comments are good, and they fail. The articles focus on “Buy” build instead of “” and they wonder whether the project management controls work and the project is to bring benefits to the community of stakeholders. focus not the comments or to check assumptions, the actual results of the project makes sense to. This is in the process of project management experience. A review that actually resembles the Actual results may be helpful in ensuring that the project chose.ConclusionAinsi still some, while the methodology of project management to law as a way to avoid some pitfalls have seen the most obvious observed in the projects should be careful Practitioners believe that the adoption of a particular method is a panacea for all projets.Une both the perspective of the team and other stakeholders will have been fulfilled, it is useful to assess an independent review of your plan and assumptions. Regular updating of the project process can be useful, depending on the size of the change experienced during the delivery.