Lorentz transformations in conflict with the ban target méthodologiquePar Kalmykov RavilRavil8 @ Yandex. ruRésuméUn makes compliance principles in an inertial coordinate system and the measurement is usually measured displacement by another system as the only point on the chart with the elementary spacetime stem cells has been demonstrated clearly and convincingly. The inadmissibility of the methodology for the comparison between the systems of all parts of the territory or the time is increased. A conclusion on how a methodical inaccuracy of Einstein’s clock synchronization, and all known variants of the conclusion of the Lorentz transformations is established on this basis. The other variant transformations of space-time is proposed and its compatibility with the Michelson-Morley is displayed. Philosophical reflections on the author’s true cognitive status of the Lorentz transformations are invoqués.1. About to do a technique for the comparison of the segments spatiauxMalheureusement, only used the old criticism of the considerable number of researchers to quite reasonable Lorentz transformations in special relativity theory, have not been received by the scientific community in the far right. deduce the reasons for the author of this article on methodological inaccuracies of the process of these transformations are not to [1] considered. Obviously, these losses are credited to the particular ideology and methodological complexity of the situation and the conviction of the critical current bad argument. We will try, the more convincing bien.Pas secret that give the important role the invention of the Minkowski space to four dimensions in special time in the company a more graphical representation of the special theory of relativity (which were especially common through the distortion of space-time four dimensions of a questionable nature of the synchronization of the clocks and the thesis of man-invariance of an interval received) has played in his time. We also use elementary geometry to give our graphic reasons, but specifically complexes.Comme invented distortion it adopted in all elementary textbooks, we will consider a standard situation with an oscillating movement of the two systems K and K at high speed along the axes x and x combined “. (See Figure 1). FIG 1In the more we have to exclude axes Y, Y, Z, Z ‘consideration of simplicity and we represent a situation in the orthogonal Cartesian coordinates, on a two-dimensional space-time. (See Figure 2). Fig 2BY analogy with Minkowski space-time look, we see that every point is at this level with the spatial coordinates and time, a world event in a situation décrite.Voici XOT – System of a stationary observer. During the first instant of time than is usual, the reference points twosystems O and O ‘applies as to be contiguous. Point O ‘moves in the time on an axis x’ in this figure, which represents a direct line with an axis cornerφin t. At that time, φ = arctgV, where V-speed moving system K ‘superior relative to the K-system perspective of the observer K-system, such as the movement of the rod AB is based in the system K’ and is located along an axis x ‘ is doing here. Of course, the rod will slide over time on an axis x ‘with all the points, too. Note that all points of a rod in the system co-exist K ‘at the same time, at a time “section” or time “Echelon.” From the experience meant “being” We know from Einstein that the violation occurs divided the principle of simultaneity of events in the points in the space of two systems moving at high speed. This phenomenon has been called “a relativity of simultaneity. The essence of a phenomenon is clearly visible on the figure 2. All simultaneous events in K lying on straight lines parallel to the axis Ox. For example, simultaneous events in pointsAx and BX here. But the events in the simultaneous system K ‘, was already on the line parallel to the axis Ox. In particular, there are points A and B. It turns out that two events simultaneously in the system K, not like in the system K’ and, most on the contrary. Every school child knows today. Now we will try to make the act of measuring the length of the bar, organize through the possibilities and tools for fixed K. In the system K along the axis Ox we have a bar, through which we to measure the length of a moving rod. try Note that all points of the bar to the same time (in a part time side by side) on the x-axis in the combined time t = 0 on an axis parallel to it in each moment of time. The standard technique for detecting contact of the length of a segment is the superposition of its ends with point labels on a bar. Means, a bar and a bar should fall two spouses () world events. employ as it with us In this case, is it? In Figure 2, it is clearly visible that the stem cells can be overlaid without effort or at least clean the Extreme doubled with all the bars are in the system from all parts, moving with the same velocity relative to K. These rods are on lines parallel to the axis Ox ‘(eg U.S.) appear. However, it is impossible to say the same thing about the axis Ox. It appears that the axes Ox and Ox’ are not parallel, can not completely overlap and can be crossed at one point. The result of the basic axioms of Euclid. It seems that the stem can be a bar to reach the moment of time at one end only own (at large – by one point in his own body) . An overlay of the other end of the stick (as a rule – any point on the economy) with a bar that is possible, and in another moment of time, thanks to a certain time interval. However, this means that the second event in steps occurs one other time. During the specified time period is the first end of a shaft and all other items on his body, yes, “go” to the great distance, so correct that it does not turn as an act of measurement. In essence, important fact that all points of a body from a tribe, with the exception of a superimposed, appear in different time levels. Each point of a body from a strain of a meeting with a full bar, only to wait for certain time step. The conclusion of transparency from here follows that not the parent, and a bar two or more common global events (falls), and thus their length is comparable in substance. This conclusion is so important that merit appointment as a special cognitive restriction or prohibition that we later . We have previously described in detail [1], today, this extraordinary event is clearly visible through the display géométrique.Peut-being, something is changed in order to try to measure, without contact to be used with distance transmission of information by a signal? But signals from the ends of a rod be rented at the same time in the system of fixed bar with the same speed, go to a bar, be it for a while by the time direct axis parallel to Ox, “and can therefore not meet simultaneously in the system Ox. These signals are to be replaced during this time within the time scale and not the time with a different level. The situation will be similar to the attempted transfer of a signal in the opposite direction, in a bar with a pole. The two alternatives that we already have in detail previously [1] discussed. For an ordinary case of this small speeds, perhaps not as great methodological value. While described “failure of simultaneity” no time bar “to go” too far then observed distortions of its length from another system is negligible. However, if the rods joint move with speeds close to high-cons far, the problem is the underlying. If strict methodological approach is scientifically observed, it is necessary to verify that the law on the precise measurement of the length of the stem and usually means the length of lines in the air, proved by measuring the displacement, in principle, impossible. Also notes the prohibition of the methodological objective comparison between the systems of lengths of line and other parameters along a line of travel of both systems expanded space. Since these parts can only be a global event, as we have seen in Fig. 2, the parameters of the two systems completely defined by higher this case, for example, its geographical coordinates are only for comparison purposes should. So it is permissible to compare, coordinate systems moving roaming on a Point.2. Transformation from a broad tempsDans classical mechanics at low speeds and axes t consider border. Here are the coordinates transformations from one point to the transition from the reduced rectangular Cartesian system K-oblique angle (affine) system K ‘with an adjacent axis T (t’). Galilean transformation are: x ‘= x – t · Vt’ = tCependant we know that the Galilean transformations are not compatible with the Maxwell equations. For a case of motion with the speed of light or other forms of proximity should be found. Again, there is growth in all it is a methodological problem: How can changes in the formulas above conditions prohibiting discovery on the objective comparison of the systems include the lengths of the lines? We will recall that all known variants based the conclusion of the Lorentz transformations on the comparison between observed cluster systems including infinitesimal (dx, dr, DS). Of course, this should be meant to incorrect procedures in terms of objective scientific methodology. In addition, there is every reason to believe that the Lorentz transformations, or derived from sources mentioned is wrong, may not be necessary formulas correct transformations. The scandal is such a mess apparaît.Comment methodology that could happen? Sure, in the days of relativity theory special creation of intuitive desire to assist the transformation of a space component of the transformation of an element of time with physicists prefer to play a bad joke. The second, apparently was too afraid of their uniqueness. “Therefore, the physicists, the idea of Lorentz space on” flattening “of the objects with high speed and the corresponding formula for this deformation alternative.En these critical days virtually taken was empirical rule over minds of physicists. And critical empirical principle of economy of the most popular thinking in this case, apparently to save themselves a principle of their minds, which leads to reflection on a way more typical, less offensive systems. But it seemed so “stingy” was as a result of the large bog terrible consequences: Because of the Lorentz transformation have the coordinates in space and time distorted, plus a phenomenon of relativity of simultaneity, and more. And only now a methodological imprecision of these transformations has been discovered. Obviously, it is necessary for other methodologically correct, and possible savings really thought and not lead to changes, if grandiose.Nous noted earlier [1] that the correct formulas can easily be received directly from the analysis of the spiritual experience “train” of Einstein. observers believe the station save concluded that the problem of relativity of simultaneity, which is a problem in two hours delay systems can be solved easily if the fact admit to the presence of Commute time divided into the space of the points. It is therefore necessary that the formula for converting a time scale by the addition of space first component correctly dépendant.Nous already calculated the size of a mismatch of scales t and t ‘s analysis of this experience [a mental]: = Θt, where x – distance between two points on the scale described OxDe formula shows that in the case of coincidence of the direction vectors and the displacement has positive size, and in case of deviations – negative. This, for example in the event of an investigation of the boundary motion of the object observed, the relative backwardness of the events on a time scale, and in case of an opposite direction – a relativeforestalling will take place. One end of the train in the experience with mental health train “Einstein for the viewer, the movement on a train, and the others – cons. This prevents a relative happened on one end and a delay at the other end of the movement of a train during the movement of the radius lumière.Ainsi offset the situation for the movement with a speed close to the light beam on the basic space-time will consider the geometric as follows: Fig OT 3Comme axes and are in a corner led to another, see the reasoning above, the axes Ox and Ox “will be just for them. It is necessary to check that the pieces on a time scale or time intervals in both systems, a common movement may also have to cross a single point. Thus, time intervals in the two systems is not methodologically correct comparison with any others. It is possible to overlap on a single coordinate scales periods.3. Lorentz transformations and to try the Way of clock synchronization Einstein’s – outside the loiRésumons up on a way to measure correctly, it is a fundamental methodological obstacle. It seems in principle impossible. It that the superposition point one space-time in passing each other two systems (in the case of space-time four dimensions – on a plane y overlaid was discovered, z) is allowed. With the terminology of the Minkowski, it is necessary to approve two of these systems only an event in the world in general. As such a global event beginning or end of a beam of light in the handset top coordinates of the two systems (see Figure 2) as with the Michelson-Morley experiment, or an encounter made of two bars in the middle of a line segment in the spiritual experience ” train “Einstein may be sufficient. But in any case, a second point, second, even it can not be properly stacked. So pieces of the mutual comparison of the lengths of space or time in two of these systems is completely impossible.De a particular conclusion: All calculations in the comparison of more than a point and a two-dimensional plane in the four-dimensional case, it is necessary to say more precisely the wrong account, in general illicite.S take it for all variants of the “completion” of the Lorentz transformations for a two-dimensional case, the base rent on a comparison Another type of parts (parts spatial and temporal vectors, radius vectors and intervals), even infinitesimal (dx, dt, dr, DS), it is necessary to detect anything wrong. Therefore, it is necessary to identify all illegal changes obtained in this way. It is necessary to be wrong by Einstein synchronized clocks available on the comparison between all systems of the same pieces of the space-time-based. Let’s say we have this facts brought to the attention earlier. Everything, what is visible now descriptively-géométriquement.Connaissant Größe a Miss ratio of Skalen Zeit, it’s möglich, the Formel transformationT write ‘= T-. This means the two-dimensionale Raum-time level, the axis’ t comment on an axis under this cornerψto tA arcctg ψ To view the new transformation formulas =. for two systems that will move look like this: x ‘= x – t · Vt’ = t-It is not necessary think of nothing ici.4. New system of transformations and the Michelson-MorleyDe Obviously it is necessary to show how the proposed changes to the system coordinates with the experimental data. We will examine an example of the Michelson-Morley experiment (see Figure 3) accept: Fig 4Nous that possible world unique event, usually two systems – one meeting in time and space of two beams, longitudinal and cross at a point O is taking place. For the system is connected to the test facility is It is all so obvious. In the system where the experimental system moves with velocity V, the events occur at the same point in space, but with trips on time. size of the shift is known as a spiritual experience with the train “Einstein and Equality: Θx considered =, where x – distance between two points on Ox.L studied observer, which he did “” Oh, the center of A, which includes time spent in a way by a cross bar égalt1 = 2l / c + ΘAO ( with a shift of time scales between points A and O). The time spent by a longitudinal fasciculus on passageАВ is égaltab = L / C + ΘAB (with a shift of time scales between points A and B). And the time spent égalitéTOB = L / c – ΘOB (With a displacement of a time scale between points A and B passageОВ and changes sign at a movement in the opposite direction). In andОВ sumАВ are to be equal, taking into account a difference of two trips (= ΘAO ΘAB – ΘOB usually a longitudinal signal time passaget2 longitudinal): t2 = TOB + TAB = 2l / c = + ΘAO t1Ainsi, the transit times of longitudinal and transverse direction of the shoulder of the interferometer is equal to move to the viewer. Consent to an experience of course. We need to believe and declare that even the results of all experiments show different “relativistic” formulas caractéristiques.Contre get loads of changes in its apparent “asymmetry” are possible. Actually leads the call for the inclusion of the symmetry changes to the following: x = x ‘+ V’ t · “t = t ‘+ However, it is necessary to ensure that V and V’ speeds mutual shift of perspective from both systems, the parameters are quite different. presence in both systems from a global event limit we exclude the possibility of systems that dt by the rate of private parts divisions spatial and temporal V = dx /, V ‘= dx / dt are defined, to compare. Thus, the formulas and inverse transformations are not contradictory, and no problem with a form of reverse transformation présent.5. The cognitive status of the transformations LorentzLa situation with a ban on the comparison of pieces of space-time should researchers who want to puzzle, but have sufficient information to large capacity events in other systems. Perhaps all Lorentz transformations are also useful in all cases? In Figure 1, it is obvious that moving rod AB AxBx projection raises the x axis, axis AOTC projection and Ot. can be neglected in case of unavailability of accurate measurement method for the correction of the researchers, the clarity and picturesque, of course, want to, losses in the displacement of a rod in the absence of time to define for itself a problem Poster quasi-projections do it right and is named as a substitute for real parameters. In the absence of a normal mirror, it is possible, alternatively, try using a distorting mirror. Lorentz exact formula, it is necessary between these representations are failing. It is obvious that they distort the actual characteristics of the observed object and can be used in the strict calculations, but no one forbids the use of approximate representations for the approximate calculation. But for all that it is important to remember this quasi-accuracy, in the head . keep it is necessary to recognize the error of the authors and proponents of the special theory of relativity, because this performance in a near correct classification of a single reality with which it is necessary to collect much. In fact, with the help the Lorentz transformations, it is possible to assess the magnitude of distortion observable real parameters of the moving objects. It is the only feature of a specific aberration of an image observed at high speed – and no longer be a local Lorentz que.Transformations distortions observed It is an individual’s physical ‘observation, a version of the descriptive science, the quest for the absolute “narrow private, limited exclusively to that is naturally found in the experiment and that the opening of a scientific basis for resist pattern of the causal phenomena . Strictly speaking, the crude intermediate semi-empirical knowledge can be called bad by the scientific system of theoretical thought, a part science.A D. Bohm [2] the shining example dealt with two passengers is recessive, each of them in the opinion of the other, ultimately to a reduction in observable dimensions. But everyone knows, observes that in this case, the angular size only drawback, and that no one come into his head to emphasize the actual reduction in the size of travelers. It is possible, an example to give as a distortion of a noise heard in the motion of the source, called the Doppler effect: white Everyone that only specific phenomenon caused by the movement of a mutual source and receiver, and he does not have the attitude of the basic physics of sound. If the use of photographic or video equipment from exposure, great movement Fusion themes from an image in a power failure. Fortunately, no one has a terrible conclusion of this for the actual loss of the precise contours of moving objects. For some, possible, numerous examples of specific distortions and deviations, situations to give mutual support movement of the subject and the observer, it is possible to describe for the refined aesthetic to a desired image exotic local observable phenomenon, it is also possible to Leave the special philosophy exalted fascinated observer. However, it is not necessary to attempt to seek absolute, this perversion of the physical being replaced objectif.Malheureusement strict, we live in an era of domination of the philosophy of empiricism in modern versions today. One of its branches relativism is to overestimate what a bad position of the observer and the objective characteristics to minimize the objects of nature. But in the area where the strict observance of the exact sciences, there is however a strong desire an intuitive knowledge of the objective existence the real world, independent of the observer and his cognitive situation. This spontaneous movement materialistic, unfortunately, has yet to find any decent refinement of the traditional philosophy of materialism has to answer is not in a position to a number of key issues. However, it is now possible, with, breathe a sigh relief, at last a solid academic writers of the materialistic orientation, can the traditional stumbling blocks to overcome the materialism and to develop and the hand rests on the one hand with other progressive philosophies. It is the realism of the synthesis the use of the idea of determinism cycle [3, 4]. The situation with the relativism, in our opinion, are clearly explained by an example. We will introduce us to the large tree branches on each branch of which a crow is, of herself as the smartest. It is clear that each of them to watch the world around them through the special link, has distinguished himself a certain picture of the events and the event model from others. If standing on a path absolute Image observable Favorites empiricists and relativists, it is necessary to have a large number of variants of reality differ from each other process that lead to chaos in knowledge. Much more reliable and more comfortable, professing a principle of polyhedral (multiple) monism [3, 4] to accept the fact of the existence of a single objective reality, visible from different observers links specific and thus of course in different cognitivesImmédiatement their descriptions.6. New Place after the great philosopher Kant, we should ask: Can I really know the world around them around, especially to its limits very far? “Obviously, this has the basic characteristics of originality and should therefore characterized by a particular principle, which is offered under projet.Principe limited accessibility: its two systems, but that move each other with high speeds (Compare the measurement or other purposes) is not something more space-time in a two-dimensional case and nothing more than a space-time plane, perpendicular to the movement, in one case in four dimensions. Therefore, in these systems are complete, the parameters defined at this point, for example, coordinates its space-time can only be compared. All other settings seem unattainable comparaison.Elle not mean, of course, they all disappeared somewhere in the “native” system, in fact, their exact value for the Distance from inaccessible “relativistic” observer. If the observer adheres to the philosophy of empiricism in its modern versions, to consider it a conclusion favorable for him, the real absence of these parameters inaccessible to him, usually completely out of the sphere ruled out of consideration. Or it might collide with them later in the new context (for example, in the case of adjusting the speed) and also it can even appear in a similar situation when the parameter is ignored his own system by others observateurs.Il will is necessary to note that this situation so surprising these days and recalls the role that has developed in mechanics is a microcosm of the extensive number of combinations of certain parameters describing the motion of particles microphone inaccessible to the observer macro. Unfortunately, in contrast to our case, there is the micro particle is a private “opportunity to defend themselves” robbing physicist unpunishedly absolutely the right to own combinations of these parameters objectively. In particular, they have removed their right to their own path of motion . He was previously declared a primitive empirical principle: I mean no respect – that it does not exist in nature.